QUIZ
Imagine you own a store or webshop.
The store has an average Gross Margin of 55%
minus Selling, General and Administrative operating expenses of 53%
equals a Net Profit 2%.
In the store you are selling two comparable products.
You
sell the same Quantity, the same number of units of both.
One
is a sustainable product, the customers pay you €4 for selling it and then you pay
the factory €2 per unit for supplying it.
The
factory charges €1 for the other product. At what selling price would it be
as (un)profitable as the sustainable product?
|
Factory gets |
Customer
pays |
Sustainable product |
€ 2 |
€ 4 |
Other product |
€ 1 |
€ x ? |
What price would the customer have to pay for the Other Product for it to have the same margin and to be equally profitable as the Sustainable product? \\
€ x = ........ ?
Why? .................................
CHEATSHEET
The answer is simple. It is based on counting money:
Sustainable
product €4 Selling Price - €2 Buying Price = €2 contribution margin.
(#Deckungsbeitrag db)
The
product that is bought for €1 has to be sold for €1+ €2 contribution margin =
€3 to result in the same net profit.
The
math: Store Net Profit = € Margin per unit x Quantity sold - € Store Expenses
-----------------------------------------------------
Many
stores use the following suboptimal percentage math:
Net
Profit = Sales x (Gross Margin % - Expenses %)
The
sustainable product has a margin % of 50% (€2/€4) and the other product would
be considered equally profitable when sold with the same margin for €2 (€1/€2 =
50%)
In
reality it is not equally profitable, it only generates half the cash flow
because…..
“You cannot take percentages to the bank.”
KEY: "Opportunity based costing": When weighing assortment options instead of comparing margin %s to expense %s or attempting to allocate expenses to SKU's the German Deckungsbeitrag framework considers "Opportunitieitskosten" of the relative Deckungbeitrag.
Murphy USA stores (ticker MUSA) use this framework. Hornbach and others do not.
For our white paper by C&A colleagues et al see: www.profitperx.com
No comments:
Post a Comment